FeaturesPricingAudit GuideFree StatementDashboard →

SiteArmor vs UserWay: True Accessibility vs Overlay Solutions

Compare SiteArmor and UserWay accessibility solutions. Learn the pros and cons of overlays vs true accessibility scanning.

8 min read

Overview

UserWay offers an AI-powered accessibility overlay similar to accessiBe and AudioEye. While overlays are easy to implement, they don't solve underlying accessibility problems and face significant criticism from the accessibility community. SiteArmor provides genuine, defensible accessibility scanning.

UserWay

$240/month

starting price

SiteArmor

$99 one-time scan

starting price

UserWay Weaknesses

Overlay-based approach

UserWay relies on overlays that apply visual and behavioral modifications without fixing underlying code. Screen readers still encounter inaccessible HTML, missing alt text, and semantic problems.

Accessibility community opposition

WebAIM, W3C, NFB, and AFBF have published statements opposing overlays. UserWay's technology is explicitly criticized by the organizations most respected in accessibility.

False compliance sense

Website owners may believe their sites are accessible after deploying UserWay, when in reality the code is unchanged and still inaccessible. This creates long-term legal liability.

Limited effectiveness

Testing has shown UserWay overlays break screen reader functionality, create keyboard navigation issues, and introduce new accessibility barriers.

No privacy or security scanning

UserWay focuses only on accessibility. CCPA, GDPR, BIPA, and security issues are completely outside their scope.

Requires JavaScript injection

UserWay loads third-party JavaScript on every page, creating performance and privacy risks. User data is processed by UserWay's servers.

SiteArmor Advantages

True accessibility scanning

SiteArmor identifies real code issues: alt text, color contrast, ARIA labels, semantic HTML. You get facts and remediation steps, not overlay band-aids.

Comprehensive three-in-one scanning

One scan covers accessibility, privacy compliance (CCPA, GDPR, BIPA, VCDPA), and security. No need for multiple tools or vendors.

No privacy/performance risks

SiteArmor doesn't inject third-party JavaScript or collect user data. Your website's privacy and performance remain pristine.

Legal defensibility

SiteArmor reports provide documented evidence of good-faith compliance efforts. Courts recognize this as stronger legal protection than overlays.

Cost-effective

$99 one-time scan vs ongoing overlay subscriptions. No monthly lock-in or vendor dependency.

WCAG 2.1 Level AA focus

Detailed guidance on achieving genuine WCAG 2.1 Level AA compliance, the standard courts expect.

Feature Comparison

FeatureUserWaySiteArmor
Solution TypeOverlay (visual modifications only)Comprehensive code scanning
Fixes Underlying IssuesNo; masks problems without fixing codeYes; identifies and guides remediation of actual issues
Screen Reader SupportOften breaks screen reader functionalityIdentifies screen reader compatibility issues for fixing
Keyboard NavigationLimited support; may create new issuesComprehensive keyboard navigation scanning
Industry Support (W3C, WebAIM, NFB)Explicitly opposedFollows WCAG 2.1 standards
Privacy/Security ScanningNot includedIncluded (CCPA, GDPR, BIPA, etc)
Third-party JavaScriptRequired; privacy/performance impactNot required
Implementation ComplexityMedium (code injection required)None (read-only scanning)
Monthly Cost$240-$990+None; $99 one-time or $299/month unlimited
Court RecognitionIncreasingly deemed insufficient for ADA complianceComprehensive reports support legal defense

Verdict

UserWay is an easy implementation, but ease doesn't equal effectiveness. Overlays are increasingly rejected by courts, accessibility experts, and the disability community as inadequate solutions. SiteArmor provides genuine, defensible accessibility compliance without the ethical or legal concerns of overlay-based approaches.

Choose UserWay if...

UserWay might appeal to companies seeking a quick fix without understanding long-term accessibility liability. If your only goal is appearing compliant without actually becoming compliant, UserWay is easier. We don't recommend this approach.

Choose SiteArmor if...

SiteArmor is for organizations genuinely committed to accessibility. If you want true WCAG 2.1 Level AA compliance, privacy and security protection, no vendor lock-in, and cost-effective scanning, SiteArmor is the clear choice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is UserWay's overlay approach sufficient for ADA compliance?
No. Courts are increasingly skeptical of overlay-based compliance. UserWay overlays may mask problems temporarily, but the underlying inaccessible code remains. Recent settlements require actual remediation.
Why does the disability community oppose UserWay?
Overlays don't fix accessibility problems—they create false compliance. Users with disabilities still encounter broken screen readers, missing alt text, and inaccessible forms. Overlays provide false confidence without real accessibility.
What privacy risks does UserWay create?
UserWay's JavaScript is loaded on every page and processes user behavior through their servers. This creates privacy risks and unnecessary data collection compared to SiteArmor's read-only scanning approach.
Can I get accessibility reports from UserWay like SiteArmor?
UserWay provides limited reporting focused on overlay status, not underlying code issues. SiteArmor provides detailed, actionable reports on every accessibility problem with remediation guidance.
What happens if I switch from UserWay to real remediation?
You'll discover all the underlying accessibility problems that UserWay was masking. SiteArmor scanning can identify these issues upfront so you can fix them properly.

Check your website for free

Get your ADA, WCAG, privacy & security score in 90 seconds.

No credit card
WCAG 2.1
ADA
Privacy

Related guides